CLINIC RECORD · HAYATMED issued 2026-07-08 · v1
HayatMed, Istanbul
Beşiktaş · FUE / DHI · facilitator (partner hospitals)
Hair restoration · FUE / DHI / Sapphire
Surgeon — named
PENDING
check pending Measured · 82%
M1 · Facility & health-tourism licence 2 · 20%
UNVERIFIED No certificate number is shown; only 'operates in line with Turkish MoH requirements' and 'fully accredited', while JCI is claimed for unnamed partner hospitals rather than HayatMed and there is no USHAŞ, so its own accreditation is thin and the score sits low. source ↗
M2 · Operating surgeon named + verifiable 4 · 22%
UNVERIFIED Dr. Gürkan Albayrak is named and 'personally performs graft extraction rather than delegating entirely to technicians', but no ISHRS or ABHRS profile surfaced, so who operates is named yet not directory-confirmed. source ↗
M3 · Technique disclosure 4 · 10%
UNVERIFIED FUE (6–7h), DHI (Choi, 7–9h, +£200–300), Sapphire FUE and no-shave are described with session-length detail, keeping method disclosure high but below top for lack of a role map. source ↗
M4 · Claim / graft honesty 4 · 14%
UNVERIFIED No egregious claims — a max of 4,500 grafts/session, no 'unlimited', '100%', '99%' or blanket guarantee — though it cites a '2.1% revision rate' and '92% satisfaction by month 12' (non-verifiable), keeping it high. source ↗
M5 · Price transparency 4 · 8%
UNVERIFIED Published indicative ranges (unusual for a facilitator) — packages £1,590–3,400 and per-graft £0.64–1.40, marked 'approximate' with a personalised final quote — keep it below top for lack of fixed figures. source ↗
M6 · Aftercare & revision policy 5 · 8%
UNVERIFIED 'Written revision terms before booking' with touch-up sessions 'at reduced or no cost depending on documented cause' if density is below expectation at month 12, plus photo reviews at weeks 1/4/12/24 up to 12 months, give top aftercare disclosure. source ↗
Editorial · 18%
E1 · Professional corroboration 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — Only a vague 'active involvement with international hair-transplantation organizations' with no named body and no public directory entry, so society corroboration is low. source ↗
E2 · International-patient path 4 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — The surgeon is fluent in Turkish/English, the site runs EN/Arabic/Polish with WhatsApp, a '24-hour emergency line from the UK', remote photo follow-up and stated informed-consent and complication protocols before booking, keeping it below top only for unverified detail. source ↗
E3 · Operator transparency 2 · 6%
UNVERIFIED editorial — A facilitator rather than a hospital, with a Beşiktaş address but no registered legal-entity name published, partner hospitals referenced but unnamed, and a shared-surname pair in the About page hinting at common ownership (unconfirmed), holding the score low. source ↗
Focus: medical-travel / package operator · -5 to the composite
Health-tourism licensed: caveat
Operating surgeon named: yes
In register scope: yes
Clinic operating: yes
What this register does NOT measure We do not rate the result of a transplant, a surgeon's skill, graft survival, complications or "who's better". We verify structural facts: the health-tourism authorization, the operating surgeon, the technique, the claims, the prices, the aftercare — and where something is unconfirmed, we say so.